Evolution is bad, so stars can't possibly evolve

post from Pharyngula on 05 February 2007 09:04:26 PM. © Pharyngula

It isn't just biology that creationists like to mangle—watch how one of our IDist pals completely screws the pooch on the subject of "stellar evolution". She trots out the whole menagerie of creationist canards in a bizarre attempt to defend the wacky Walt Brown and dismiss whole chunks of physics and astronomy.

It just goes to show that there's something about the word "evolution" that unhinges these kooks. Everyone does know that biological evolution and stellar evolution are completely unrelated processes that don't share any mechanisms, right?

Read the comments on this post...

Read The Full Article:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/pharyngula/~3/87012162/evolution_is_b
ad_so_stars_cant.php